Americas > Study highlights CDR benefits, impacts of BECCS versus afforestation and reforestation

Study highlights CDR benefits, impacts of BECCS versus afforestation and reforestation

Published 01:45 on June 30, 2023  /  Last updated at 01:45 on June 30, 2023  /  Americas, Asia Pacific, EMEA, International, Nature-based, Voluntary

A new study highlights the relative benefits and impacts of two major carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods - bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and afforestation and reforestation (AR) - on the carbon cycle and surface climate.
A new study highlights the relative benefits and impacts of two major carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods - bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and afforestation and reforestation (AR) - on the carbon cycle and surface climate.


A Carbon Pulse subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as our premium content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL of our subscription service and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, log in here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.