Biodiversity > Biodiversity indicators must be reviewed to avoid biased GBF monitoring, study warns

Biodiversity indicators must be reviewed to avoid biased GBF monitoring, study warns

Published 13:34 on January 30, 2024  /  Last updated at 00:50 on January 31, 2024  / /  Biodiversity, International

Indicators selected for the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) should be regularly reviewed to ensure that contradictions are identified, and progress toward global conservation goals is not misrepresented, a study has recommended.
Indicators selected for the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) should be regularly reviewed to ensure that contradictions are identified, and progress toward global conservation goals is not misrepresented, a study has recommended.


A Carbon Pulse login is required to read this content. Register today to access all biodiversity content in full for free.
You can also apply for a FREE TRIAL of our subscription service, for unrivalled news and intelligence on carbon markets and net zero as well as biodiversity. See what we offer.
If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, log in here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.