Americas > Biomass-based carbon removal outperforms DAC, ERW in efficiency -study

Biomass-based carbon removal outperforms DAC, ERW in efficiency -study

Published 14:24 on February 5, 2025  /  Last updated at 14:24 on February 5, 2025  / /  Americas, International, Nature-based, US, Voluntary

Biomass-based carbon removal and storage (BiCRS) methods achieve higher CO2 retention than direct air capture (DAC) and enhanced rock weathering (ERW), according to new scientific research assessing the efficiency and energy use of 12 engineered carbon removal technologies.
Biomass-based carbon removal and storage (BiCRS) methods achieve higher CO2 retention than direct air capture (DAC) and enhanced rock weathering (ERW), according to new scientific research assessing the efficiency and energy use of 12 engineered carbon removal technologies.


A Carbon Pulse subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as our premium content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL of our subscription service and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, log in here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.