Americas > “Fundamentally flawed” or “perfectly sensible”: Chevron doctrine cases see SCOTUS reconsider interpretation of federal law

“Fundamentally flawed” or “perfectly sensible”: Chevron doctrine cases see SCOTUS reconsider interpretation of federal law

Published 01:13 on January 18, 2024  /  Last updated at 01:38 on January 18, 2024  / /  Americas, US

In two US Supreme Court cases whose outcomes could impact the enforcement of environmental law, justices are questioning the balance of power between the judiciary and executive branches in implementation of federal legislation.
In two US Supreme Court cases whose outcomes could impact the enforcement of environmental law, justices are questioning the balance of power between the judiciary and executive branches in implementation of federal legislation.


A Carbon Pulse subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as our premium content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL of our subscription service and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, log in here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.