Americas > Improved forest management methodologies present high risk of over-crediting, says think tank

Improved forest management methodologies present high risk of over-crediting, says think tank

Published 16:43 on February 21, 2024  /  Last updated at 16:43 on February 21, 2024  / Alejandra Padin-Dujon /  Americas, Asia Pacific, EMEA, International, Kyoto Mechanisms, Nature-based, Voluntary

Several improved forest management (IFM) methodologies present a high risk of overstating emissions impacts, according to factsheets released Wednesday alongside a new set of carbon credit quality scores by a German think tank in partnership with NGOs.
Several improved forest management (IFM) methodologies present a high risk of overstating emissions impacts, according to factsheets released Wednesday alongside a new set of carbon credit quality scores by a German think tank in partnership with NGOs.


A Carbon Pulse subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as our premium content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL of our subscription service and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, login here.