Offset registry launches defence of forest carbon methodologies that academics found flawed

Published 22:26 on April 4, 2023  /  Last updated at 15:54 on April 5, 2023  / /  Americas, International, Nature-based, US, Voluntary

An offset registry and standards body on Tuesday countered criticism from a recent academic study that alleged over-crediting in improved forest management (IFM) protocols used in both voluntary and compliance carbon markets.
An offset registry and standards body on Tuesday countered criticism from a recent academic study that alleged over-crediting in improved forest management (IFM) protocols used in both voluntary and compliance carbon markets.


A Carbon Pulse subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as our premium content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL of our subscription service and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, log in here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.