BRIEFING: Spot the difference – breaking down the climate risk rulebooks

Published 19:04 on September 27, 2022  /  Last updated at 19:04 on September 27, 2022  / /  Africa, Americas, Asia Pacific, Australia, Canada, China, EMEA, International, Japan, Mexico, Middle East, New Zealand, Other APAC, South & Central, South Korea, Switzerland, US

Companies are set to face a maze of intersecting climate risk reporting requirements as early drafts of three competing rulebooks and comments analysed by Carbon Pulse reveal an array of differences on key issues such as emissions scope, oversight, and offset use.
Companies are set to face a maze of intersecting climate risk reporting requirements as early drafts of three competing rulebooks and comments analysed by Carbon Pulse reveal an array of differences on key issues such as emissions scope, oversight, and offset use.


A Carbon Pulse subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as our premium content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL of our subscription service and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, log in here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.