Americas > Common forest carbon indices with remote sensing unreliable, new method performs better -study

Common forest carbon indices with remote sensing unreliable, new method performs better -study

Published 15:12 on March 28, 2024  /  Last updated at 15:12 on March 28, 2024  / /  Americas, Nature-based, South & Central, Voluntary

Several commonly accepted vegetation indices used to estimate forest carbon baselines produce noisy data and risk over- or under-crediting, while multifaceted canopy height estimates are more consistent, according to research published this month.
Several commonly accepted vegetation indices used to estimate forest carbon baselines produce noisy data and risk over- or under-crediting, while multifaceted canopy height estimates are more consistent, according to research published this month.


A Carbon Pulse subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as our premium content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL of our subscription service and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, log in here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.