New report backs REDD+ carbon crediting as robust, in face of ongoing criticism

Published 16:23 on December 10, 2024  /  Last updated at 12:10 on December 11, 2024  / /  Americas, Asia Pacific, EMEA, Nature-based, Voluntary

A white paper, published Tuesday by a voluntary carbon marketing firm and a nature-tech company, has argued that carbon crediting in REDD+ projects has been systematically robust across the sector’s history, despite criticism that its methodologies continue to over-credit activities.
A white paper, published Tuesday by a voluntary carbon marketing firm and a nature-tech company, has argued that carbon crediting in REDD+ projects has been systematically robust across the sector’s history, despite criticism that its methodologies continue to over-credit activities.


A Carbon Pulse subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as our premium content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL of our subscription service and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, log in here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.