Scarcity of high-quality CDR raises need for stricter, equity-based use -study

Published 22:14 on March 25, 2026 / Last updated at 22:14 on March 25, 2026 / / Americas (LATAM & Caribbean, US & Canada), Asia Pacific (Asia, Pacific), CO2 Management (Engineered Removals), EMEA (Africa, Europe, Middle East), International (UN Climate Talks), Voluntary (VCM Governance)

Carbon Pulse PremiumNet Zero Pulse

Carbon removal (CDR) should be reserved for the most difficult-to-eliminate emissions and allocated based on responsibility and capability, researchers said, arguing that misusing limited supply could undermine climate targets.
Carbon removal (CDR) should be reserved for the most difficult-to-eliminate emissions and allocated based on responsibility and capability, researchers said, arguing that misusing limited supply could undermine climate targets.


A subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to Carbon Pulse Premium or Net Zero Pulse to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as other content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL to each of our subscription services and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, login here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.