EMEA > Europe > Improved forest management methodologies present high risk of over-crediting, says think tank

Improved forest management methodologies present high risk of over-crediting, says think tank

Published 16:43 on February 21, 2024 / Last updated at 16:43 on February 21, 2024 / / Americas, Asia Pacific, EMEA (Europe), International, Nature-based Carbon (Forestry), Voluntary (VCM Governance)

Carbon Pulse PremiumNature & Biodiversity PulseNet Zero Pulse

Several improved forest management (IFM) methodologies present a high risk of overstating emissions impacts, according to factsheets released Wednesday alongside a new set of carbon credit quality scores by a German think tank in partnership with NGOs.
Several improved forest management (IFM) methodologies present a high risk of overstating emissions impacts, according to factsheets released Wednesday alongside a new set of carbon credit quality scores by a German think tank in partnership with NGOs.


A subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to Carbon Pulse Premium, Net Zero Pulse and/or Nature & Biodiversity Pulse to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as other content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL to each of our subscription services and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, login here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.