International > ANALYSIS: Avoidance versus removals debate reignites amid REDD over-crediting concerns

ANALYSIS: Avoidance versus removals debate reignites amid REDD over-crediting concerns

Published 18:19 on January 26, 2023  /  Last updated at 19:49 on January 26, 2023  / /  International, Nature-based, Voluntary

Concerns about over-crediting of REDD+ forest conservation projects have rekindled debate on whether carbon removals are preferable to carbon avoidance, though the differences are not always clear.
Concerns about over-crediting of REDD+ forest conservation projects have rekindled debate on whether carbon removals are preferable to carbon avoidance, though the differences are not always clear.


A Carbon Pulse subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as our premium content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL of our subscription service and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, log in here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.