Americas > California’s forestry offset protocol defense lacks academic support, new report claims

California’s forestry offset protocol defense lacks academic support, new report claims

Published 18:35 on July 12, 2019  /  Last updated at 19:28 on July 12, 2019  / /  Americas, Canada, US

California regulator ARB has not made adequate arguments in defending the state's compliance grade forestry offset protocol, and changes should made to address the methodology's lenient leakage guidelines, a new policy brief said.
California regulator ARB has not made adequate arguments in defending the state's compliance grade forestry offset protocol, and changes should made to address the methodology's lenient leakage guidelines, a new policy brief said.


A Carbon Pulse subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as our premium content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL of our subscription service and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, log in here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.