Existing carbon project requirements may create perverse incentives for biodiversity conservation, research says

Published 11:22 on April 1, 2026 / Last updated at 11:22 on April 1, 2026 / / Asia Pacific (Asia), Nature & Biodiversity (Corporate, Markets), Nature-based Carbon (Forestry, Other NbS), Voluntary (VCM Developments)

Carbon Pulse PremiumNature & Biodiversity PulseNet Zero Pulse

Existing approaches to ensuring additionality, leakage, and permanence in nature-based carbon projects may fail to support biodiversity conservation, a new study argued.
Existing approaches to ensuring additionality, leakage, and permanence in nature-based carbon projects may fail to support biodiversity conservation, a new study argued.


A subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to Carbon Pulse Premium, Net Zero Pulse and/or Nature & Biodiversity Pulse to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as other content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL to each of our subscription services and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, login here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.