Major nature markets fall short of golden credibility rules -research

Published 15:48 on January 12, 2026 / Last updated at 15:48 on January 12, 2026 / / Americas (US & Canada), Asia Pacific (Pacific), EMEA (Europe), Nature & Biodiversity (Corporate, Markets), Nature-based Carbon (Forestry)

Carbon Pulse PremiumNature & Biodiversity PulseNet Zero Pulse

Researchers this week proposed five ‘golden rules’ to assess the scientific credibility of nature markets, creating a scorecard against which eight of the world’s most well-known nature markets fail.
Researchers this week proposed five ‘golden rules’ to assess the scientific credibility of nature markets, creating a scorecard against which eight of the world’s most well-known nature markets fail.


A subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to Carbon Pulse Premium, Net Zero Pulse and/or Nature & Biodiversity Pulse to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as other content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL to each of our subscription services and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, login here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.