Study urges corporates to define their own residual emissions, in absence of global consensus

Published 16:01 on May 19, 2026 / Last updated at 16:01 on May 19, 2026 / / Americas (LATAM & Caribbean, US & Canada), Asia Pacific (Asia, Pacific), EMEA (Africa, Europe, Middle East), Net Zero Transition (Industrial Decarbonisation, Transport & Heating Fuels), Voluntary (VCM Developments)

Carbon Pulse PremiumNet Zero Pulse

Companies aiming for net zero should begin to classify their emissions from fastest and easiest to cut through to hardest-to-abate, in order to overcome the challenge of pinpointing the residual emissions that will need to be removed to hit the 'net', according to researchers.
Companies aiming for net zero should begin to classify their emissions from fastest and easiest to cut through to hardest-to-abate, in order to overcome the challenge of pinpointing the residual emissions that will need to be removed to hit the 'net', according to researchers.


A subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to Carbon Pulse Premium or Net Zero Pulse to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as other content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL to each of our subscription services and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, login here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.