EMEA > Africa > COP30: INTERVIEW – Structural issues and risks around PACM make Article 6.2 a better fit for durable CDR

COP30: INTERVIEW – Structural issues and risks around PACM make Article 6.2 a better fit for durable CDR

Published 15:01 on November 19, 2025 / Last updated at 15:01 on November 19, 2025 / / Americas (LATAM & Caribbean, US & Canada), Asia Pacific (Asia, Pacific), CO2 Management (CCUS, Engineered Removals), EMEA (Africa, Europe, Middle East), Insights (Interviews), International (Paris Article 6/PACM, UN Climate Talks), Nature-based Carbon (Other NbS), Voluntary (VCM Governance)

Carbon Pulse PremiumNature & Biodiversity PulseNet Zero Pulse

The greater stability and private-sector integration in Article 6.2 make it more suited to durable carbon removals (CDR) than the Article 6.4 Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (PACM), according to the chief commercial officer at a removals standard.
The greater stability and private-sector integration in Article 6.2 make it more suited to durable carbon removals (CDR) than the Article 6.4 Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (PACM), according to the chief commercial officer at a removals standard.


A subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to Carbon Pulse Premium, Net Zero Pulse and/or Nature & Biodiversity Pulse to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as other content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL to each of our subscription services and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, login here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.