CO2 Management > CCUS > Consultants debate carbon accounting in removals vs reductions ‘showdown’

Consultants debate carbon accounting in removals vs reductions ‘showdown’

Published 23:56 on June 30, 2025 / Last updated at 23:56 on June 30, 2025 / / CO2 Management (CCUS, Engineered Removals), Nature-based Carbon (Forestry, Other NbS), Voluntary (VCM Developments)

Carbon Pulse PremiumNature & Biodiversity PulseNet Zero Pulse

Carbon removal projects that underdeliver credits are better suited to provide a transparent accounting of delivery shortfalls than carbon reduction projects, although reduction projects have the advantage of maturity, consultants argued Monday.
Carbon removal projects that underdeliver credits are better suited to provide a transparent accounting of delivery shortfalls than carbon reduction projects, although reduction projects have the advantage of maturity, consultants argued Monday.


A subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to Carbon Pulse Premium, Net Zero Pulse and/or Nature & Biodiversity Pulse to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as other content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL to each of our subscription services and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, login here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.