Nature-based Carbon > Forestry > New ARR methodology praised for ecology requirements, but accounting concerns remain -ratings agency

New ARR methodology praised for ecology requirements, but accounting concerns remain -ratings agency

Published 23:23 on May 14, 2025 / Last updated at 23:23 on May 14, 2025 / / Americas (US & Canada), Nature-based Carbon (Forestry), Voluntary (VCM Governance)

Carbon Pulse PremiumNature & Biodiversity PulseNet Zero Pulse

A ratings agency praised a new afforestation, reforestation, and revegetation (ARR) methodology for the novel way in which it required projects to employ local ecologists to fine-tune restoration plans, but noted a critical shortcoming in the protocol's carbon accounting method.
A ratings agency praised a new afforestation, reforestation, and revegetation (ARR) methodology for the novel way in which it required projects to employ local ecologists to fine-tune restoration plans, but noted a critical shortcoming in the protocol's carbon accounting method.


A subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to Carbon Pulse Premium, Net Zero Pulse and/or Nature & Biodiversity Pulse to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as other content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL to each of our subscription services and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, login here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.