FEATURE: Market consensus grows around biodiversity credits as a separate environmental financing tool from carbon

Published 15:54 on December 16, 2025 / Last updated at 15:54 on December 16, 2025 / and / Americas (LATAM & Caribbean, US & Canada), Asia Pacific (Asia, Pacific), EMEA (Africa, Europe, Middle East), Insights (Features), Nature & Biodiversity (Markets)

Nature & Biodiversity Pulse

There is a growing consensus among market participants that biodiversity credits should be developed as a distinct asset class from carbon, while still allowing outcomes to be claimed as co-benefits where appropriate in order to expand financing options for nature and give buyers and project developers greater flexibility.
There is a growing consensus among market participants that biodiversity credits should be developed as a distinct asset class from carbon, while still allowing outcomes to be claimed as co-benefits where appropriate in order to expand financing options for nature and give buyers and project developers greater flexibility.


A subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to Nature & Biodiversity Pulse to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as other content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL to each of our subscription services and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, login here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.