Americas > Criticism of California forestry protocol misinterprets academic research, author says

Criticism of California forestry protocol misinterprets academic research, author says

Published 19:06 on June 6, 2019 / Last updated at 19:06 on June 6, 2019 / / Americas, Canada, US

Criticism of California’s compliance offset forestry protocol misinterpreted an academic report on emissions leakage, according to the author of that research, who suggested state regulator ARB should fund further studies to gain a more accurate picture.
Criticism of California’s compliance offset forestry protocol misinterpreted an academic report on emissions leakage, according to the author of that research, who suggested state regulator ARB should fund further studies to gain a more accurate picture.


A Carbon Pulse subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as our premium content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL of our subscription service and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, log in here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.