California forestry offset protocol does not warrant changes due to academic criticism, ARB says

Published 17:05 on May 31, 2019  /  Last updated at 17:05 on May 31, 2019  /  Americas, Canada, US  /  No Comments

California regulator ARB does not believe criticism of its cap-and-trade programme's forestry offset protocol raised by a recent policy brief merits any changes to the methodology, because the study included numerous inaccuracies, according to an agency presentation.

California regulator ARB does not believe criticism of its cap-and-trade programme’s forestry offset protocol raised by a recent policy brief merits any changes to the methodology, because the study included numerous inaccuracies, according to an agency presentation.

A Carbon Pulse subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as our premium content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL of our subscription service and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, login here.

Comment