Stakeholders call out California’s carbon price collars, offset regulations

Published 22:39 on October 22, 2018  /  Last updated at 23:52 on October 22, 2018  /  Americas, Canada, US  /  No Comments

California cap-and-trade participants argued the Air Resources Board’s (ARB) approach to post-2020 price collars are in conflict with the state's overarching legislation, while stakeholders are also pushing for a more expansive definition for in-state offsets to increase future supply, according to public comments.

California cap-and-trade participants argued the Air Resources Board’s (ARB) approach to post-2020 price collars are in conflict with the state’s overarching legislation, while stakeholders are also pushing for a more expansive definition for in-state offsets to increase future supply, according to public comments.

A Carbon Pulse subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as our premium content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL of our subscription service and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, login here.

Comment