CO2 Management > CCUS > Integrity of most BiCRS protocols fall short -study

Integrity of most BiCRS protocols fall short -study

Published 23:22 on March 18, 2026 / Last updated at 00:54 on March 19, 2026 / / CO2 Management (CCUS, Engineered Removals), Nature-based Carbon (Other NbS)

Carbon Pulse PremiumNature & Biodiversity PulseNet Zero Pulse

A new study found just 28% of biomass carbon removal and storage (BiCRS) protocols assessed had a satisfactory integrity grade, as authors warned the emerging sector must learn from the challenges that have affected forestry credits.
A new study found just 28% of biomass carbon removal and storage (BiCRS) protocols assessed had a satisfactory integrity grade, as authors warned the emerging sector must learn from the challenges that have affected forestry credits.


A subscription is required to read this content. Subscribe today to Carbon Pulse Premium, Net Zero Pulse and/or Nature & Biodiversity Pulse to access our unrivalled news and intelligence, as well as other content including all job listings. Click here for details.

We offer a FREE TRIAL to each of our subscription services and it only takes a minute to register. If you already have a Carbon Pulse account, login here.

This page is intended to be viewed online and may not be printed.
As per our terms and conditions, the republication or redistribution of Carbon Pulse content can result in the suspension or termination of your subscription.